The Not-so-ethical By-stander
Johnson, in a book on workplace ethics,
states:
“Assuming the role of ethical change agent also means
identifying and dispelling misunderstandings or myths that
serve as barriers to ethical transformations. I call the
first of these myths ‘There’s nothing to it.'"
Nothing to it? Is that so?
Jennings says,
“A 1999 survey by the Society for Human Resource
Management found that of those employees who saw something
illegal or unethical at work, only 66 percent would say
something about it. In company surveys done in 2005 and
2006, we find that about 50 percent of employees will
report illegal or unethical conduct. Of those who would say
nothing, nearly all of them (96 percent) indicated that the
reason for their inaction was that they did not want to be
called “not a team player.” Cultures of fear and silence
nurture the team-player concept, borrowing the buy-in and
strong hold that comes from groupthink and the inability,
as Solomon Asch’s studies on social conformity pressure
concluded, of most of us to speak up when we see something
wrong if those around us either do not see the problem of
have chosen to remain silent. Even the most honorable
people are submissive and subdued in a culture of fear and
silence."
We are going to discuss by-standers at length because we
believe that this is a major contributor to the ethical
violations that occur on the reservation each day.